Ford Puma Gen-E vs Kia EV2

Biggest differences: Boot — Ford Puma Gen-E 523 l, Kia EV2 362 l · Battery — Ford Puma Gen-E 46.8 kWh, Kia EV2 61 kWh · Power — Ford Puma Gen-E 168 PS, Kia EV2 135 PS.

Ford Puma Gen-E

The Ford Puma Gen-E is an all-electric subcompact crossover with a range of 419 kilometers and acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in 8 seconds.

Kia EV2

The Kia EV2 is an electric SUV in the B-segment, offering two front-wheel drive variants with different battery capacities and power outputs.

Profile against the market: Ford Puma Gen-E vs Kia EV2

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Ford Puma Gen-E or Kia EV2 — who wins where

Ford Puma Gen-E leads 6 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmKia EV2 +34 km
    Ford Puma Gen-E
    419
    Kia EV2
    453
  • Battery kWhKia EV2 +14.2 kWh
    Ford Puma Gen-E
    46.8
    Kia EV2
    61
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmFord Puma Gen-E −2.2 kWh/100 km
    Ford Puma Gen-E
    13
    Kia EV2
    15.2
  • Power PSFord Puma Gen-E +33 PS
    Ford Puma Gen-E
    168
    Kia EV2
    135
  • 0–100 km/h sFord Puma Gen-E −1.5 s
    Ford Puma Gen-E
    8
    Kia EV2
    9.5
  • Top speed km/hKia EV2 +1 km/h
    Ford Puma Gen-E
    160
    Kia EV2
    161
  • DC charging kWKia EV2 +18 kW
    Ford Puma Gen-E
    100
    Kia EV2
    118
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Ford Puma Gen-E
    11
    Kia EV2
    11
  • Charging minFord Puma Gen-E −4 min
    Ford Puma Gen-E
    26
    Kia EV2
    30
  • Weight kgFord Puma Gen-E −67 kg
    Ford Puma Gen-E
    1488
    Kia EV2
    1555
  • Boot lFord Puma Gen-E +161 l
    Ford Puma Gen-E
    523
    Kia EV2
    362

Add a third car

Technical data: Ford Puma Gen-E vs Kia EV2

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Ford Puma Gen-E vs Kia EV2
Key parameters Ford Puma Gen-E
Electric
Kia EV2
61 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range419 km453 kmKia +34 km
Battery46.8 kWh61 kWhKia +14.2 kWh
Consumption13 kWh/100 km15.2 kWh/100 kmFord −2.2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW118 kWKia +18 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%26 min30 minFord −4 min
Range per minute of charging11.3 km/min10.6 km/minFord +0.7 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power168 PS135 PSFord +33 PS
0–100 km/h8 s9.5 sFord −1.5 s
Top speed160 km/h161 km/hKia +1 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1488 kg1555 kgFord −67 kg
Boot523 l362 lFord +161 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Kia
Length4214 mm4060 mmFord +154 mm
Width1805 mm1800 mmFord +5 mm
Height1555 mm1575 mmKia +20 mm
Wheelbase2588 mm2565 mmFord +23 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Ford Puma Gen-E

Cost per 100 km3.9
Monthly49
Yearly585

Kia EV2

Cost per 100 km4.56
Monthly57
Yearly684

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Ford Puma Gen-E

Kia EV2

Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Ford Puma Gen-E or Kia EV2?

The Kia EV2 goes further: 453 km WLTP against the 419 km of the Ford Puma Gen-E. That is a difference of 34 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Kia EV2 — its 61 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Ford Puma Gen-E, with 46.8 kWh, does not offer it.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Ford Puma Gen-E takes more: 523 l against 362 l in the Kia EV2. The difference is 161 l.

Which charges faster?

The Ford Puma Gen-E accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Kia EV2 up to 118 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 26 and 30 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.