Changan Deepal S07 vs Subaru E-Outback
Biggest differences: 0–100 km/h — Changan Deepal S07 7.9 s, Subaru E-Outback 4.5 s · Power — Changan Deepal S07 218 PS, Subaru E-Outback 381 PS · DC charging — Changan Deepal S07 92 kW, Subaru E-Outback 150 kW.
Changan Deepal S07
The Changan Deepal S07 is an SUV in the D segment, offering rear-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 475 km.
Subaru E-Outback
The Subaru E-Outback is an SUV in the D segment, offering all-wheel drive (AWD) and a WLTP range of 526 kilometers.
Profile against the market: Changan Deepal S07 vs Subaru E-Outback
- Changan Deepal S07RWD
Subaru E-OutbackAWD 280 kW
Changan Deepal S07 or Subaru E-Outback — who wins where
Subaru E-Outback leads 7 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmSubaru E-Outback +51 km
- Battery kWhChangan Deepal S07 +9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmSubaru E-Outback −3.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSSubaru E-Outback +163 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sSubaru E-Outback −3.4 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWSubaru E-Outback +58 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgSubaru E-Outback −63 kg
- Boot lSubaru E-Outback +109 l
Technical data: Changan Deepal S07 vs Subaru E-Outback
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Changan Deepal S07 RWD | Subaru E-Outback AWD 280 kW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 475 km | 526 km | Subaru +51 km |
| Battery | 79.97 kWh | 71 kWh | Changan +9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.6 kWh/100 km | 15.3 kWh/100 km | Subaru −3.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 92 kW | 150 kW | Subaru +58 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 35 min 30–80% | 28 min 10–80% | 7 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 6.8 km/min | 13.2 km/min | Subaru +6.4 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 218 PS | 381 PS | Subaru +163 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.9 s | 4.5 s | Subaru −3.4 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2073 kg | 2010 kg | Subaru −63 kg |
| Boot | 510 l | 619 l | Subaru +109 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Changan |
| Length | 4750 mm | 4845 mm | Subaru +95 mm |
| Width | 1930 mm | 1860 mm | Changan +70 mm |
| Height | 1625 mm | 1675 mm | Subaru +50 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2900 mm | 2850 mm | Changan +50 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Changan Deepal S07
Subaru E-Outback
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Changan Deepal S07
Subaru E-Outback
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Changan Deepal S07 or Subaru E-Outback?
The Subaru E-Outback goes further: 526 km WLTP against the 475 km of the Changan Deepal S07. That is a difference of 51 km.
Why does the Changan Deepal S07 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Subaru E-Outback?
The Changan Deepal S07 carries 79.97 kWh and covers 475 km, while the Subaru E-Outback with its 71 kWh battery does 526 km. Energy use decides it: 18.6 against 15.3 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Changan Deepal S07 and the Subaru E-Outback differ?
The Changan Deepal S07 has RWD and 218 PS. The Subaru E-Outback has AWD and 381 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Changan Deepal S07 — its 79.97 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Subaru E-Outback, with 71 kWh, does not offer it.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.