BYD Seal U vs Nissan Ariya

Biggest differences: AC charging — BYD Seal U 11 kW, Nissan Ariya 22 kW · 0–100 km/h — BYD Seal U 9.6 s, Nissan Ariya 7.6 s · Boot — BYD Seal U 552 l, Nissan Ariya 466 l.

BYD Seal U

The BYD Seal U is an SUV in the D segment, offering two front-wheel drive variants with different battery capacities and WLTP ranges.

Nissan Ariya

The Nissan Ariya is a crossover in the D segment that offers both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive options, with a range of up to 533 kilometers (WLTP).

Profile against the market: BYD Seal U vs Nissan Ariya

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BYD Seal U or Nissan Ariya — who wins where

Nissan Ariya leads 6 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmNissan Ariya +33 km
    BYD Seal U
    500
    Nissan Ariya
    533
  • Battery kWhNo difference
    BYD Seal U
    87
    Nissan Ariya
    87
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmNissan Ariya −2.4 kWh/100 km
    BYD Seal U
    20.5
    Nissan Ariya
    18.1
  • Power PSNissan Ariya +21 PS
    BYD Seal U
    217
    Nissan Ariya
    238
  • 0–100 km/h sNissan Ariya −2 s
    BYD Seal U
    9.6
    Nissan Ariya
    7.6
  • Top speed km/hBYD Seal U +15 km/h
    BYD Seal U
    175
    Nissan Ariya
    160
  • DC charging kWBYD Seal U +10 kW
    BYD Seal U
    140
    Nissan Ariya
    130
  • AC charging kWNissan Ariya +11 kW
    BYD Seal U
    11
    Nissan Ariya
    22
  • Weight kgNissan Ariya −88 kg
    BYD Seal U
    2147
    Nissan Ariya
    2059
  • Boot lBYD Seal U +86 l
    BYD Seal U
    552
    Nissan Ariya
    466

Add a third car

Technical data: BYD Seal U vs Nissan Ariya

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BYD Seal U vs Nissan Ariya
Key parameters BYD Seal U
Design 87 kWh
Nissan Ariya
87 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range500 km533 kmNissan +33 km
Battery87 kWh87 kWhNo difference
Consumption20.5 kWh/100 km18.1 kWh/100 kmNissan −2.4 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging140 kW130 kWBYD +10 kW
AC charging11 kW22 kWNissan +11 kW
Charging 28 min 30–80%30 min 20–80%2 min
Range per minute of charging8.9 km/min10.7 km/minNissan +1.8 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power217 PS238 PSNissan +21 PS
0–100 km/h9.6 s7.6 sNissan −2 s
Top speed175 km/h160 km/hBYD +15 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight2147 kg2059 kgNissan −88 kg
Boot552 l466 lBYD +86 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4785 mm4595 mmBYD +190 mm
Width1890 mm1850 mmBYD +40 mm
Height1668 mm1650 mmBYD +18 mm
Wheelbase2765 mm2775 mmNissan +10 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BYD Seal U

Cost per 100 km6.15
Monthly77
Yearly922

Nissan Ariya

Cost per 100 km5.43
Monthly68
Yearly815

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BYD Seal U

Nissan Ariya

Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BYD Seal U or Nissan Ariya?

The Nissan Ariya goes further: 533 km WLTP against the 500 km of the BYD Seal U. That is a difference of 33 km.

Which has the bigger boot?

The BYD Seal U takes more: 552 l against 466 l in the Nissan Ariya. The difference is 86 l.

Which charges faster?

The BYD Seal U accepts up to 140 kW DC, the Nissan Ariya up to 130 kW.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Nissan Ariya uses less electricity: 18.1 kWh/100 km against 20.5 kWh/100 km in the BYD Seal U. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 360 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.