Mercedes EQV vs Peugeot E-Traveller
Biggest differences: Power — Mercedes EQV 204 PS, Peugeot E-Traveller 136 PS · Battery — Mercedes EQV 93.3 kWh, Peugeot E-Traveller 69 kWh · Weight — Mercedes EQV 2719 kg, Peugeot E-Traveller 2136 kg.
Mercedes EQV
The Mercedes EQV is an all-electric van in the D-segment, offering two variants with different battery capacities and ranges.
Peugeot E-Traveller
The Peugeot E-Traveller is an electric van in the D segment, offering two battery variants with a range from 223 km to 351 km in the WLTP cycle.
Profile against the market: Mercedes EQV vs Peugeot E-Traveller
Mercedes EQVEQV 300
Peugeot E-TravellerStandard 75 kWh
Mercedes EQV or Peugeot E-Traveller — who wins where
Mercedes EQV leads 6 to 2
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmMercedes EQV +14 km
- Battery kWhMercedes EQV +24.3 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmPeugeot E-Traveller −3.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSMercedes EQV +68 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sMercedes EQV −2 s
- Top speed km/hMercedes EQV +28 km/h
- DC charging kWMercedes EQV +10 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgPeugeot E-Traveller −583 kg
- Boot lNo data
Technical data: Mercedes EQV vs Peugeot E-Traveller
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Mercedes EQV EQV 300 | Peugeot E-Traveller Standard 75 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 365 km | 351 km | Mercedes +14 km |
| Battery | 93.3 kWh | 69 kWh | Mercedes +24.3 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 27.5 kWh/100 km | 24.3 kWh/100 km | Peugeot −3.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 110 kW | 100 kW | Mercedes +10 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 45 min 10–80% | 45 min 0–80% | No difference |
| Range per minute of charging | 5.7 km/min | 6.2 km/min | Peugeot +0.5 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 204 PS | 136 PS | Mercedes +68 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 12.2 s | 14.2 s | Mercedes −2 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 132 km/h | Mercedes +28 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2719 kg | 2136 kg | Peugeot −583 kg |
| Boot | — | — | — |
| Length | 5370 mm | 4980 mm | Mercedes +390 mm |
| Width | 1928 mm | 1920 mm | Mercedes +8 mm |
| Height | 1901 mm | 1890 mm | Mercedes +11 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3200 mm | 3275 mm | Peugeot +75 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Mercedes EQV
Peugeot E-Traveller
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Mercedes EQV
Peugeot E-Traveller
Other comparisons in this class: Van, segment D
Mercedes EQVvs
Opel Zafira ElectricMercedes EQVvs
Volkswagen e-Transporter KombiMercedes EQVvsVolkswagen ID. BuzzMercedes EQVvs
Maxus MIFA 7Peugeot E-TravellervsVolkswagen e-Transporter KombiPeugeot E-Travellervs
Citroën ë-SpaceTourerPeugeot E-TravellervsVolkswagen ID. BuzzPeugeot E-TravellervsMaxus MIFA 7Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Mercedes EQV or Peugeot E-Traveller?
The Mercedes EQV goes further: 365 km WLTP against the 351 km of the Peugeot E-Traveller. That is a difference of 14 km.
Which is more powerful — Mercedes EQV or Peugeot E-Traveller?
The Mercedes EQV is stronger: 204 PS against the 136 PS of the Peugeot E-Traveller. The gap is 68 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Mercedes EQV accepts up to 110 kW DC, the Peugeot E-Traveller up to 100 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Peugeot E-Traveller uses less electricity: 24.3 kWh/100 km against 27.5 kWh/100 km in the Mercedes EQV. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 480 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.