Fiat E-Ulysse vs Xpeng X9

Biggest differences: DC charging — Fiat E-Ulysse 100 kW, Xpeng X9 542 kW · Power — Fiat E-Ulysse 136 PS, Xpeng X9 320 PS · WLTP range — Fiat E-Ulysse 345 km, Xpeng X9 615 km.

Fiat E-Ulysse

The Fiat E-Ulysse is an electric van in segment E, offering front-wheel drive (FWD) and a luggage capacity of 605 liters.

Xpeng X9

The Xpeng X9 is an electric van in the E-segment, offering three powertrain options with power ranging from 320 horsepower to 503 horsepower.

Profile against the market: Fiat E-Ulysse vs Xpeng X9

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Fiat E-Ulysse or Xpeng X9 — who wins where

Xpeng X9 leads 8 to 1

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmXpeng X9 +270 km
    Fiat E-Ulysse
    345
    Xpeng X9
    615
  • Battery kWhXpeng X9 +41.2 kWh
    Fiat E-Ulysse
    68.8
    Xpeng X9
    110
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmXpeng X9 −6.7 kWh/100 km
    Fiat E-Ulysse
    26.7
    Xpeng X9
    20
  • Power PSXpeng X9 +184 PS
    Fiat E-Ulysse
    136
    Xpeng X9
    320
  • 0–100 km/h sXpeng X9 −5.6 s
    Fiat E-Ulysse
    13.3
    Xpeng X9
    7.75
  • Top speed km/hXpeng X9 +70 km/h
    Fiat E-Ulysse
    130
    Xpeng X9
    200
  • DC charging kWXpeng X9 +442 kW
    Fiat E-Ulysse
    100
    Xpeng X9
    542
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Fiat E-Ulysse
    11
    Xpeng X9
    11
  • Weight kgFiat E-Ulysse −554 kg
    Fiat E-Ulysse
    2136
    Xpeng X9
    2690
  • Boot lXpeng X9 +116 l
    Fiat E-Ulysse
    605
    Xpeng X9
    721

Add a third car

Technical data: Fiat E-Ulysse vs Xpeng X9

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Fiat E-Ulysse vs Xpeng X9
Key parameters Fiat E-Ulysse
75 kWh L2
Xpeng X9
FWD Long Range
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range345 km615 kmXpeng +270 km
Battery68.8 kWh110 kWhXpeng +41.2 kWh
Consumption26.7 kWh/100 km20 kWh/100 kmXpeng −6.7 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW542 kWXpeng +442 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 45 min 0–80%12 min 10–80%33 min
Range per minute of charging6.1 km/min35.9 km/minXpeng +29.8 km/min
Voltage800 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power136 PS320 PSXpeng +184 PS
0–100 km/h13.3 s7.75 sXpeng −5.6 s
Top speed130 km/h200 km/hXpeng +70 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight2136 kg2690 kgFiat −554 kg
Boot605 l721 lXpeng +116 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Xpeng
Length4981 mm5316 mmXpeng +335 mm
Width2010 mm1988 mmFiat +22 mm
Height1890 mm1785 mmFiat +105 mm
Wheelbase3275 mm3160 mmFiat +115 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Fiat E-Ulysse

Cost per 100 km8.01
Monthly100
Yearly1202

Xpeng X9

Cost per 100 km6
Monthly75
Yearly900

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Fiat E-Ulysse

Xpeng X9

Other comparisons in this class: Van, segment E

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Fiat E-Ulysse or Xpeng X9?

The Xpeng X9 goes further: 615 km WLTP against the 345 km of the Fiat E-Ulysse. That is a difference of 270 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Xpeng X9 — its 110 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Fiat E-Ulysse, with 68.8 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — Fiat E-Ulysse or Xpeng X9?

The Xpeng X9 is stronger: 320 PS against the 136 PS of the Fiat E-Ulysse. The gap is 184 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Xpeng X9 takes more: 721 l against 605 l in the Fiat E-Ulysse. The difference is 116 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.