Cupra Tavascan vs Škoda Enyaq Coupé
Biggest differences: Consumption — Cupra Tavascan 15.9 kWh/100 km, Škoda Enyaq Coupé 14.7 kWh/100 km · WLTP range — Cupra Tavascan 553 km, Škoda Enyaq Coupé 591 km · Boot — Cupra Tavascan 540 l, Škoda Enyaq Coupé 570 l.
Cupra Tavascan
The Cupra Tavascan is an all-electric coupe in the D segment, offering three different powertrain options with varying power outputs and ranges, from 190 horsepower to 340 horsepower.
Škoda Enyaq Coupé
The Škoda Enyaq Coupé is an electric SUV-coupe in the D segment, offering four different powertrain options with varying power outputs and ranges.
Profile against the market: Cupra Tavascan vs Škoda Enyaq Coupé
Cupra TavascanEndurance
Škoda Enyaq Coupé85
Cupra Tavascan or Škoda Enyaq Coupé — who wins where
Škoda Enyaq Coupé leads 5 to 0
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmŠkoda Enyaq Coupé +38 km
- Battery kWhNo difference
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Enyaq Coupé −1.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNo difference
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Enyaq Coupé −0.1 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgŠkoda Enyaq Coupé −33 kg
- Boot lŠkoda Enyaq Coupé +30 l
Technical data: Cupra Tavascan vs Škoda Enyaq Coupé
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Cupra TavascanEndurance | Škoda Enyaq Coupé85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 553 km | 591 km | Škoda +38 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 77 kWh | No difference |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.9 kWh/100 km | 14.7 kWh/100 km | Škoda −1.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 135 kW | 135 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 28 min | 28 min | No difference |
| Range per minute of charging | 13.8 km/min | 14.8 km/min | Škoda +1 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 286 PS | No difference |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.8 s | 6.7 s | Škoda −0.1 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2103 kg | 2070 kg | Škoda −33 kg |
| Boot | 540 l | 570 l | Škoda +30 l |
| Length | 4644 mm | 4658 mm | Škoda +14 mm |
| Width | 1861 mm | 1879 mm | Škoda +18 mm |
| Height | 1597 mm | 1623 mm | Škoda +26 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2766 mm | 2766 mm | No difference |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Cupra Tavascan
Škoda Enyaq Coupé
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Cupra Tavascan
Škoda Enyaq Coupé
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Cupra Tavascan or Škoda Enyaq Coupé?
The Škoda Enyaq Coupé goes further: 591 km WLTP against the 553 km of the Cupra Tavascan. That is a difference of 38 km.
Which charges faster?
The Cupra Tavascan accepts up to 135 kW DC, the Škoda Enyaq Coupé up to 135 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 28 and 28 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Škoda Enyaq Coupé uses less electricity: 14.7 kWh/100 km against 15.9 kWh/100 km in the Cupra Tavascan. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 180 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.