Changan Deepal S07 vs VinFast VF 8
Biggest differences: DC charging — Changan Deepal S07 92 kW, VinFast VF 8 150 kW · Power — Changan Deepal S07 218 PS, VinFast VF 8 354 PS · Boot — Changan Deepal S07 510 l, VinFast VF 8 376 l.
Changan Deepal S07
The Changan Deepal S07 is an SUV in the D segment, offering rear-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 475 km.
VinFast VF 8
The VinFast VF 8 is a D-segment SUV offering all-wheel drive and power ranging from 354 to 408 horsepower, with a WLTP range of up to 471 kilometers.
Profile against the market: Changan Deepal S07 vs VinFast VF 8
Changan Deepal S07 or VinFast VF 8 — who wins where
VinFast VF 8 leads 5 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmChangan Deepal S07 +4 km
- Battery kWhVinFast VF 8 +7.7 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmChangan Deepal S07 −4.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVinFast VF 8 +136 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVinFast VF 8 −2 s
- Top speed km/hVinFast VF 8 +20 km/h
- DC charging kWVinFast VF 8 +58 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgChangan Deepal S07 −382 kg
- Boot lChangan Deepal S07 +134 l
Technical data: Changan Deepal S07 vs VinFast VF 8
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Changan Deepal S07 RWD |  VinFast VF 8Eco | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 475 km | 471 km | Changan +4 km |
| Battery | 79.97 kWh | 87.7 kWh | VinFast +7.7 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.6 kWh/100 km | 22.9 kWh/100 km | Changan −4.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 92 kW | 150 kW | VinFast +58 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 35 min 30–80% | 31 min 10–70% | 4 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 6.8 km/min | 9.1 km/min | VinFast +2.3 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 218 PS | 354 PS | VinFast +136 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.9 s | 5.9 s | VinFast −2 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 200 km/h | VinFast +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2073 kg | 2455 kg | Changan −382 kg |
| Boot | 510 l | 376 l | Changan +134 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Changan |
| Length | 4750 mm | 4750 mm | No difference |
| Width | 1930 mm | 1934 mm | VinFast +4 mm |
| Height | 1625 mm | 1667 mm | VinFast +42 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2900 mm | 2950 mm | VinFast +50 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Changan Deepal S07
VinFast VF 8
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Changan Deepal S07
VinFast VF 8
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Why does the VinFast VF 8 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Changan Deepal S07?
The VinFast VF 8 carries 87.7 kWh and covers 471 km, while the Changan Deepal S07 with its 79.97 kWh battery does 475 km. Energy use decides it: 22.9 against 18.6 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Changan Deepal S07 and the VinFast VF 8 differ?
The Changan Deepal S07 has RWD and 218 PS. The VinFast VF 8 has AWD and 354 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Changan Deepal S07 — its 79.97 kWh battery then works as a power source. The VinFast VF 8, with 87.7 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Changan Deepal S07 or VinFast VF 8?
The VinFast VF 8 is stronger: 354 PS against the 218 PS of the Changan Deepal S07. The gap is 136 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.