Changan Deepal S07 vs Nio EL6

Biggest differences: Power — Changan Deepal S07 218 PS, Nio EL6 489 PS · 0–100 km/h — Changan Deepal S07 7.9 s, Nio EL6 4.5 s · DC charging — Changan Deepal S07 92 kW, Nio EL6 125 kW.

Changan Deepal S07

The Changan Deepal S07 is an SUV in the D segment, offering rear-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 475 km.

Nio EL6

The Nio EL6 is an SUV in the D segment, offering all-wheel drive and two battery capacity options while maintaining the same power output for the powertrain.

Profile against the market: Changan Deepal S07 vs Nio EL6

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Changan Deepal S07 or Nio EL6 — who wins where

Nio EL6 leads 7 to 2

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmNio EL6 +54 km
    Changan Deepal S07
    475
    Nio EL6
    529
  • Battery kWhNio EL6 +20 kWh
    Changan Deepal S07
    79.97
    Nio EL6
    100
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmChangan Deepal S07 −1.8 kWh/100 km
    Changan Deepal S07
    18.6
    Nio EL6
    20.4
  • Power PSNio EL6 +271 PS
    Changan Deepal S07
    218
    Nio EL6
    489
  • 0–100 km/h sNio EL6 −3.4 s
    Changan Deepal S07
    7.9
    Nio EL6
    4.5
  • Top speed km/hNio EL6 +20 km/h
    Changan Deepal S07
    180
    Nio EL6
    200
  • DC charging kWNio EL6 +33 kW
    Changan Deepal S07
    92
    Nio EL6
    125
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Changan Deepal S07
    11
    Nio EL6
    11
  • Weight kgChangan Deepal S07 −250 kg
    Changan Deepal S07
    2073
    Nio EL6
    2323
  • Boot lNio EL6 +69 l
    Changan Deepal S07
    510
    Nio EL6
    579

Add a third car

Technical data: Changan Deepal S07 vs Nio EL6

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Changan Deepal S07 vs Nio EL6
Key parameters Changan Deepal S07
RWD
Nio EL6
100 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range475 km529 kmNio +54 km
Battery79.97 kWh100 kWhNio +20 kWh
Consumption18.6 kWh/100 km20.4 kWh/100 kmChangan −1.8 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging92 kW125 kWNio +33 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 35 min 30–80%40 min 10–80%5 min
Range per minute of charging6.8 km/min9.3 km/minNio +2.5 km/min
Voltage400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power218 PS489 PSNio +271 PS
0–100 km/h7.9 s4.5 sNio −3.4 s
Top speed180 km/h200 km/hNio +20 km/h
DrivetrainRWDAWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight2073 kg2323 kgChangan −250 kg
Boot510 l579 lNio +69 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4750 mm4854 mmNio +104 mm
Width1930 mm1995 mmNio +65 mm
Height1625 mm1703 mmNio +78 mm
Wheelbase2900 mm2915 mmNio +15 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Changan Deepal S07

Cost per 100 km5.58
Monthly70
Yearly837

Nio EL6

Cost per 100 km6.12
Monthly76
Yearly918

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Changan Deepal S07

Nio EL6

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Changan Deepal S07 or Nio EL6?

The Nio EL6 goes further: 529 km WLTP against the 475 km of the Changan Deepal S07. That is a difference of 54 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Changan Deepal S07 and the Nio EL6 differ?

The Changan Deepal S07 has RWD and 218 PS. The Nio EL6 has AWD and 489 PS.

Which is more powerful — Changan Deepal S07 or Nio EL6?

The Nio EL6 is stronger: 489 PS against the 218 PS of the Changan Deepal S07. The gap is 271 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Nio EL6 takes more: 579 l against 510 l in the Changan Deepal S07. The difference is 69 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.